Match statistics snapshot
- Vissel Kobe fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 9Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 62% |
| 386Lead | Accurate passes | 189 |
| 521Lead | Total passes | 303 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |