Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 5 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 290Lead | Accurate passes | 223 |
| 391Lead | Total passes | 345 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Consadole Sapporo | Statistic | Vissel Kobe |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.