Coquimbo Unido vs U. Catolica
Key events
View all
U. Catolica- D. Escobar
- A. Azócar
- N. Johansen
Coquimbo UnidoFT 1–0
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Coquimbo Unido45%
- Draw45%
- U. Catolica10%
Prematch market
No prematch 1X2 odds snapshot available.
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
Estadio Bicentenario Francisco Sánchez Rumoroso
Coquimbo · Chile
- Address
- Calle Pedro de Valdivia
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 18750
Match
Reinerio Alvarado, Chile
Round 2
- Referee
- Reinerio Alvarado, Chile
- Round
- Round 2
- Date
Competition
League · Chile
- Country
- Chile (CL)
- Season
- 2025
- Dates
- 2025-02-15 → 2025-12-07
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
38%38%62%62%
Expected goals (xG)
1.9070%0.8130%
Total shots
1345%1655%
Shots on target
660%440%
Team form & competition
View all- #1Position
- 75Points
- 23-6-1W-D-L
- 49/17Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-1 / 0-3
- Worst defeats
- 2-0
- #2Position
- 58Points
- 17-7-6W-D-L
- 44/26Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 6-0 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 0-3 / 2-0
Head to head
View all4Coquimbo Unidowins
1Drawsmatches
6U. Catolicawins
Recorded meetings: 11 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Coquimbo Unido 2–3 U. Catolica
- Coquimbo Unido most goals
- U. Catolica 1–2 Coquimbo Unido
- U. Catolica most goals
- U. Catolica 4–1 Coquimbo Unido
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Ffranco-zapiola-6a791a86c4c25246361168.jpg)
Coquimbo Unido created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 0.81, Δ 1.09). U. Catolica fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots). Coquimbo Unido was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 25%). U. Catolica held more of the ball (62% possession).
Coquimbo Unido underperformed their xG by 0.9 goals (1 scored vs 1.90 xG). U. Catolica underperformed their xG by 0.8 goals (0 scored vs 0.81 xG).