Match statistics snapshot
- Coquimbo Unido created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 0.81, Δ 1.09).
- U.
- Catolica fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 1.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 171 | Accurate passes | 337Lead |
| 242 | Total passes | 407Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Coquimbo Unido | Statistic | U. Catolica |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |