Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- Cumbayá was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 13Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 300Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 384Lead | Total passes | 358 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cumbayá | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |