Match statistics snapshot
- Cuniburo created the clearer chances on xG (3.02 vs 0.49, Δ 2.53).
- Cuniburo fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Cuniburo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cuniburo | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cuniburo | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cuniburo | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cuniburo | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cuniburo | Statistic | Orense Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |