Match statistics snapshot
- Djurgardens IF created the clearer chances on xG (1.75 vs 0.88, Δ 0.87).
- Djurgardens IF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Malmo FF held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 262 | Accurate passes | 562Lead |
| 345 | Total passes | 648Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Djurgardens If | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |