Match statistics snapshot
- Emelec created the clearer chances on xG (2.03 vs 1.14, Δ 0.89).
- Emelec fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Emelec | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Emelec | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 322Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 398Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Emelec | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Emelec | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Emelec | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |