Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (2.63 vs 0.15, Δ 2.48).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (25 vs 3 shots).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 2.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.15 |
| Offsides | ||
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 521Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 589Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Bangu |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |