Match statistics snapshot
- Flamengo created the clearer chances on xG (0.26 vs 2.00, Δ 1.74).
- Flamengo fired more attempts (14 vs 2 shots).
- Flamengo was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.00Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 391Lead | Accurate passes | 307 |
| 468Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |