Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (2.39 vs 1.73, Δ 0.66).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Gremio was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 39%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 2.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.73 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 273 |
| 558Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.95 | Goals prevented | 0.95 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |