Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 0.35, Δ 1.21).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (11% on target vs 0%).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 371Lead | Accurate passes | 279 |
| 446Lead | Total passes | 350 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| Goalkeeper saves | ||
| -0.08 | Goals prevented | -0.08 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |