Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 0.86, Δ 0.19).
- Gais fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Gais was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gais | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gais | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 332 | Accurate passes | 551Lead |
| 400 | Total passes | 641Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gais | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gais | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gais | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |