Match statistics snapshot
- Gamba Osaka fired more attempts (7 vs 6 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 14%).
- Gamba Osaka held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 577Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 670Lead | Total passes | 315 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.