Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (25 vs 10 shots).
- Gamba Osaka was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 32%).
- Consadole Sapporo held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 302 | Accurate passes | 363Lead |
| 414 | Total passes | 472Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.