Match statistics snapshot
- Gamba Osaka created the clearer chances on xG (2.96 vs 0.38, Δ 2.58).
- Gamba Osaka fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 536Lead | Accurate passes | 245 |
| 639Lead | Total passes | 348 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gamba Osaka | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.