Match statistics snapshot
- Gualaceo SC fired more attempts (18 vs 14 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 17%).
- Gualaceo SC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Gualaceo Sc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Gualaceo Sc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 252Lead | Accurate passes | 196 |
| 327Lead | Total passes | 274 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Gualaceo Sc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Gualaceo Sc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Gualaceo Sc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.