Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (0.65 vs 2.91, Δ 2.26).
- Malmo FF fired more attempts (31 vs 8 shots).
- Malmo FF held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.91Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 12Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 31Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 71% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 698Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 780Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 15Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Halmstad | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |