Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 0.83, Δ 1.04).
- Inter fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Inter | Statistic | Genoa |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.83 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Inter | Statistic | Genoa |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 555Lead | Accurate passes | 305 |
| 618Lead | Total passes | 371 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Inter | Statistic | Genoa |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Inter | Statistic | Genoa |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Inter | Statistic | Genoa |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |