Match statistics snapshot
- Kawasaki Frontale created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 1.34, Δ 0.57).
- Kawasaki Frontale fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- Kawasaki Frontale was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 391 | Accurate passes | 409Lead |
| 478Lead | Total passes | 475 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.