Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo created the clearer chances on xG (1.77 vs 2.06, Δ 0.29).
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Kyoto Sanga was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 136 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 236 | Total passes | 510Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kyoto Sanga | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.