Match statistics snapshot
- Machida Zelvia created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 0.21, Δ 0.98).
- Machida Zelvia fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.21 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 262 | Accurate passes | 449Lead |
| 342 | Total passes | 520Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Machida Zelvia | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.