Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (2.00 vs 1.47, Δ 0.53).
- Malmo FF fired more attempts (25 vs 11 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 2.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.47 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 54% |
| 514Lead | Accurate passes | 111 |
| 586Lead | Total passes | 206 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.