Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.14, Δ 0.46).
- Hammarby FF was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 15%).
- Hammarby FF held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 300 | Accurate passes | 512Lead |
| 381 | Total passes | 593Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Hammarby Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.