Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 1.60, Δ 0.64).
- Malmo FF fired more attempts (21 vs 8 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 556Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 638Lead | Total passes | 238 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.