Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (1.58 vs 1.27, Δ 0.31).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Malmo FF was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 1.58Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 420Lead | Accurate passes | 338 |
| 502Lead | Total passes | 417 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.