Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (3.09 vs 1.81, Δ 1.28).
- Malmo FF fired more attempts (21 vs 11 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3.09Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.81 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 349Lead | Accurate passes | 332 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 404 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.