Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (2.19 vs 0.28, Δ 1.91).
- Malmo FF fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 2.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 18Lead | Total shots | 6 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 374Lead | Accurate passes | 328 |
| 434Lead | Total passes | 402 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Osters If |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |