Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers created the clearer chances on xG (0.44 vs 2.63, Δ 2.19).
- Rangers fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Rangers was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.63Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 446Lead | Accurate passes | 285 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 363 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Malmo Ff | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |