Match statistics snapshot
- Manta FC fired more attempts (10 vs 2 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 40%).
- Manta FC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shots | ||
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 23Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |