Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Manta FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
- Manta FC held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 234Lead | Accurate passes | 161 |
| 334Lead | Total passes | 257 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |