Match statistics snapshot
- Manta FC fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 191 | Accurate passes | 271Lead |
| 274 | Total passes | 355Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Manta Fc | Statistic | Mushuc Runa Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |