Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 0.88, Δ 0.35).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 253 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 418Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.50 | Goals prevented | -0.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |