Match statistics snapshot
- Mirassol created the clearer chances on xG (0.26 vs 0.16, Δ 0.10).
- Mirassol fired more attempts (5 vs 2 shots).
- Mirassol was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.16 |
| Offsides | ||
| 3Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 111 | Accurate passes | 172Lead |
| 129 | Total passes | 191Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.80 | Goals prevented | 0.80 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mirassol | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |