Mjallby AIF vs BK Hacken
Key events
View all
BK Hacken- A. Norén
- J. Lindberg
Mjallby AIFFT 0–1
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Mjallby AIF45%
- Draw45%
- BK Hacken10%
Prematch market
Source: 10Bet
- Mjallby AIF41.6%
- Draw26.7%
- BK Hacken31.7%
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
Strandvallen
Sölvesborg · Sweden
- Address
- Campingvägen 44, Hällevik
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 7500
Match
Kristoffer Karlsson, Sweden
Round 8
- Referee
- Kristoffer Karlsson, Sweden
- Round
- Round 8
- Date
Competition
League · Sweden
- Country
- Sweden (SE)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-04-04 → 2026-11-29
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
42%42%58%58%
Expected goals (xG)
1.1738%1.8762%
Total shots
625%1875%
Shots on target
444%556%
Team form & competition
View all- #12Position
- 23Points
- 5-8-11W-D-L
- 28/40Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 3-0 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 1-4 / 4-0
- #4Position
- 45Points
- 11-9-4W-D-L
- 43/30Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 3-0 / 0-5
- Worst defeats
- 2-4 / 3-0
Head to head
View all6Mjallby AIFwins
4Drawsmatches
5BK Hackenwins
Recorded meetings: 15 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Mjallby AIF 1–4 BK Hacken
- Mjallby AIF most goals
- BK Hacken 0–3 Mjallby AIF
- BK Hacken most goals
- Mjallby AIF 1–4 BK Hacken
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F09%2Fgivairo-read-6ab1bf94e0edf383423836.jpg)
BK Hacken created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.87, Δ 0.70). BK Hacken fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots). Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 28%). BK Hacken held more of the ball (58% possession).
Mjallby AIF underperformed their xG by 1.2 goals (0 scored vs 1.17 xG). BK Hacken underperformed their xG by 0.9 goals (1 scored vs 1.87 xG).