Match statistics snapshot
- BK Hacken created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.87, Δ 0.70).
- BK Hacken fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 28%).
Mjallby AIF vs BK Hacken
Mjallby Aif vs Bk Hacken
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.87Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 0 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
| 6 | Total shots | 18Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 342 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Bk Hacken |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |