Match statistics snapshot
- Malmo FF created the clearer chances on xG (0.44 vs 2.88, Δ 2.44).
- Malmo FF fired more attempts (25 vs 2 shots).
- Mjallby AIF was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.88Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 24% | Ball possession | 76%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 142 | Accurate passes | 621Lead |
| 224 | Total passes | 695Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mjallby Aif | Statistic | Malmo Ff |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.