Match statistics snapshot
- Montpellier created the clearer chances on xG (1.97 vs 1.12, Δ 0.85).
- Montpellier fired more attempts (21 vs 18 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 1.97Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.12 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 6 |
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 18 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 326Lead |
| 387Lead | Total passes | 375 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| -0.22 | Goals prevented | -0.22 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Montpellier | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |