Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (27 vs 8 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 13%).
- Mushuc Runa SC held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Delfin Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Delfin Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 239Lead | Accurate passes | 128 |
| 314Lead | Total passes | 218 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Delfin Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Delfin Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Delfin Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |