Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
- Emelec held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 59% | Pass accuracy | 73%Lead |
| 124 | Accurate passes | 238Lead |
| 210 | Total passes | 325Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |