Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Emelec was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 26%).
- Mushuc Runa SC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 64%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 173Lead | Accurate passes | 128 |
| 272Lead | Total passes | 203 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Emelec |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.