Match statistics snapshot
- Imbabura fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 21%).
- Imbabura held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Imbabura |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Imbabura |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 239 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 302 | Total passes | 533Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Imbabura |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Imbabura |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Imbabura |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |