Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- LDU de Quito was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 14%).
- Mushuc Runa SC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 185Lead | Accurate passes | 162 |
| 261Lead | Total passes | 241 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.