Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- LDU de Quito was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 6%).
- Mushuc Runa SC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 218Lead | Accurate passes | 150 |
| 286Lead | Total passes | 212 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Ldu De Quito |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.