Match statistics snapshot
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (22 vs 16 shots).
- Mushuc Runa SC was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 44%).
- Mushuc Runa SC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 10 | Shots outside the box | 10 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 70%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 240Lead | Accurate passes | 219 |
| 343Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |