Match statistics snapshot
- Macara created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 1.26, Δ 0.77).
- Mushuc Runa SC fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Macara was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 366Lead | Accurate passes | 231 |
| 422Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Mushuc Runa Sc | Statistic | Macara |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |