Match statistics snapshot
- Consadole Sapporo created the clearer chances on xG (0.35 vs 1.23, Δ 0.88).
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.35 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 537Lead |
| 388 | Total passes | 604Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.