Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 1.48, Δ 0.05).
- Consadole Sapporo fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Consadole Sapporo was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 381Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 471Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nagoya Grampus | Statistic | Consadole Sapporo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.