Key events
View all
Como- M. Baturina
- R. Højlund
- T. Douvikas
NapoliFT 1–2
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Prematch market
Source: 10Bet
- Napoli38.1%
- Draw30.7%
- Como31.2%
Venue
Stadio Diego Armando Maradona
Napoli · Italy
- Address
- Pizzale Vincenzo Tecchio
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 60240
Match
Luca Pairetto, Italy
Round 2
- Referee
- Luca Pairetto, Italy
- Round
- 2
- Date
Competition
League · Italy
- Country
- Italy (IT)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-08-22 → 2027-05-30
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
42%42%58%58%
Expected goals (xG)
1.3557%1.0343%
Total shots
1338%2162%
Shots on target
225%675%
Team form & competition
View all
- #8 Position
- 14 Points
- 4-2-4 W-D-L
- 17/13 Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 3-0 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 1-2 / 3-2
- #4 Position
- 23 Points
- 7-2-1 W-D-L
- 18/8 Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 2-0 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 2-0
Head to head
View all1Napoliwins
3Drawsmatches
1Comowins
Recorded meetings: 5 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Napoli 3–1 Como
- Napoli most goals
- Napoli 3–1 Como
- Como most goals
- Como 2–1 Napoli
Match headlines
Cesc Fabregas's Como win NINE-ONE in the biggest away victory in Champions League history - two weeks after thrashing Michael Carrick's Man United - in just their first year at Europe's top table
Manchester United's 4-1 battering by Como two weeks ago now looks a lucky escape - after the Italian side romped to a 9-1 victory at Lens in the Champions League.
Headlines link to a short summary; the full story is on the original publisher’s site.
Napoli created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.03, Δ 0.32). Como fired more attempts (21 vs 13 shots). Como was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 15%). Como held more of the ball (58% possession).
Napoli underperformed their xG by 0.4 goals (1 scored vs 1.35 xG). Como outperformed their xG by 1.0 goals (2 scored vs 1.03 xG).