Match statistics snapshot
- Napoli created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 1.03, Δ 0.32).
- Como fired more attempts (21 vs 13 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03 |
| 9 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 7 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
| 13 | Total shots | 21Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 385 | Accurate passes | 555Lead |
| 442 | Total passes | 609Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.54 | Goals prevented | -0.54 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Napoli | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |